Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to main content

New Study Produces Four Scenarios for Possible Future of U.S.-China Relations

Washington, D.C., Jan 17, 2024. As uncertainties intensify around the U.S.-China relations, a new study released by a bilateral collaborative group produced four scenarios for possible U.S.-China relations to help policy makers, experts and stakeholders navigate through a foreign policy maze with long term thinking tools.  

Partnering with the Brookings Institution, the group is hosting a public event on January 19th, 2024, at 10:00 am in Washington, D.C. to present and discuss the four scenarios with experts in the foreign policy community. 

The project, Four Scenarios For U.S.-China Relations and Their Impact on the Global Order to 2035, led by PAX sapiens, a Colorado-based philanthropic foundation, the Grandview Institute, a Beijing-based think tank, and Reos Partners, an international consulting group focusing on systemic change, aims to guide the relationship towards a peaceful future.  

“I believe that war is always a lose-lose; it is a failure of planning, and of governance, and a wanton waste of human resources and potential,” Marcel Arsenault, Chairman and President of PAX sapiens writes in an open letter, “the deteriorating relationship between the U.S. and China raises fears that we are headed for another, preventable, terrible, illustration of this.”  

Ren Libo, the President of Grandview Institution says, “It’s not an issue that we need to pay attention to divergences, but we need to put more effort into seeking common interests, set common goals and take common actions.” 

In 2023, 25 former government officials, retired military officers, and experts from research institutes and think tanks from the United States and China spent the better part of a year discussing and honing ideas for possible futures for the US-China relationship.  The study results in four proposed scenarios titled “Drift, War, Blocs and Networks.” 

Drift, is a scenario characterized by ongoing friction in the world drifting from crisis to crisis, where the US and China avoid war by crisis diplomacy but contest on many fronts; War, depicts a series of escalating tensions during the next decade leads to a mutually devastating violent conflict between the two countries; The Blocs scenario shows the formation of competing geopolitical blocs who don’t interact positively in any way but act to oppose each other across military, economic and diplomatic domains. Finally, Networks is a scenario in which the two countries extensively decouple, but global cooperation is maintained through complex networks mediated by international institutions and third party states.  

While the scenarios are the result of careful attention and deliberation, not every participant agrees with all of the details in this document, nor do these scenarios represent the views of the organizing and funding institutions.